Author summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video1,695 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Angelica Peebles results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 720 hits. Analysis detected 3,349 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,085 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (3,232 of 6,200 authors). This Angelica Peebles is better (less manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Angelica Peebles
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠48%Angelica Peebles (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,085
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Angelica Peebles attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Angelica Peebles vs sitewide
Angelica Peebles attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos