Speaker summary
75%1 analyzed article/video127.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eugene Parsons results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 87.5% saturation with 140 hits. Analysis detected 269.663 faulty-reasoning hits from 127.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.5% and a BS Rank of 51% (21,202 of 42,801 speakers). This Eugene Parsons is worse (more manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group.
Eugene Parsons
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
51%Eugene Parsons (selected)31%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 127.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510050.5% percentile
30.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos127.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 87.5%87.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 25.2%25.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 28.8%28.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 13.8%13.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 15.3%15.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 87.5%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 25.2%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos