Speaker summary
81%1 analyzed article/video33.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Nokes results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 50 faulty-reasoning hits from 33.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 96% (1,569 of 35,289 speakers). This Emily Nokes is worse (more manipulative) than 95.60% of the peer group.
Emily Nokes
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
0%Mike Muse1%
96%Emily Nokes (selected)100%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 33.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos