Speaker summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video42 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Ellison results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 71.4% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 30 faulty-reasoning hits from 42 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 71.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (8,464 of 45,122 speakers). This Emily Ellison is worse (more manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group.
Emily Ellison
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠82%Emily Ellison (selected)72%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 42
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510081.2% percentile
71.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos42 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 71.4%71.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 71.4%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos