Author summary
78% 1 analyzed article/video 866 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Ellison results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 759 hits . Analysis detected 3,203 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (2,277 of 9,471 authors). This Emily Ellison is worse (more manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group. Emily Ellison
Author details
Total words: 3,464
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.0% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 21.9% 21.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.2% 13.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 21.9%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.3% Indoctrination: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst