Speaker summary
⁠42%2 analyzed articles/videos170.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Edwin Díaz results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Fundamental Attribution Error, and In-Group Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 169 faulty-reasoning hits from 170.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (33,893 of 44,419 speakers). This Edwin Díaz is better (less manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group.
Edwin Díaz
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠24%Edwin Díaz (selected)15%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 170.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

24% percentile
025507510023.7% percentile
14.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos170.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 23.7%23.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 16.3%16.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 9.5%9.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%In-Group Bias: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 2.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos