Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video37 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ebert results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 51.4% saturation with 19 hits. Analysis detected 37 faulty-reasoning hits from 37 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (12,450 of 43,121 speakers). This Ebert is worse (more manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group.
Ebert
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠72%Ebert (selected)50%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 37
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510071.1% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos37 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 51.4%51.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 48.6%48.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 51.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 48.6%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos