Speaker summary
77%5 analyzed articles/videos421.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Don Beyer results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 123 hits. Analysis detected 1,275.596 faulty-reasoning hits from 421.333 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.7% and a BS Rank of 12% (39,690 of 45,123 speakers). This Don Beyer is better (less manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group.
Don Beyer
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
12%Don Beyer (selected)10%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 421.333
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510012.0% percentile
9.7% BS Score5 analyzed videos421.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 1.8%1.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 21.9%21.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 20.6%20.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 27.6%27.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.5%2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 10.6%10.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.7%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Straw Man: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 0.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 3.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 6.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate