Speaker summary
57%6 analyzed articles/videos576 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dina Levy results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 168.52 hits. Analysis detected 1,089.923 faulty-reasoning hits from 576 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (39,710 of 42,554 speakers). This Dina Levy is better (less manipulative) than 93.30% of the peer group.
Dina Levy
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
7%Dina Levy (selected)8%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 576
Article count: 6
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751006.7% percentile
7.1% BS Score6 analyzed videos576 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 22.3%22.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 14.3%14.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 1.2%1.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.9%4.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 5.5%5.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 1.7%1.7%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 13.5%13.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Primacy Effect: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate