Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video10 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democrats in Congress results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 10 hits. Analysis detected 20 faulty-reasoning hits from 10 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (1,426 of 38,926 speakers). This Democrats in Congress is worse (more manipulative) than 96.30% of the peer group.
Democrats in Congress
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠97%Democrats in Congress (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 10
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Analyzed articles and videos