Speaker summary
68%2 analyzed articles/videos634 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Swain results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Overconfidence Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 32.5% saturation with 306 hits. Analysis detected 1,532.852 faulty-reasoning hits from 634 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.6% and a BS Rank of 9% (25,956 of 28,364 speakers). This Daniel Swain is better (less manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group.
Daniel Swain
Speaker details