Speaker summary
59%5 analyzed articles/videos301.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Mendelsohn results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Horn Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Ad Hominem, with Representativeness Heuristic as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 558.53 faulty-reasoning hits from 301.333 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 11% and a BS Rank of 14% (24,521 of 28,364 speakers). This Daniel Mendelsohn is better (less manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group.
Daniel Mendelsohn