Speaker summary
73%2 analyzed articles/videos714.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Abrams results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Hasty Generalization, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 194.721 hits. Analysis detected 1,805.221 faulty-reasoning hits from 714.333 analyzed words across 2 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,529 of 28,364 speakers). This Dan Abrams is better (less manipulative) than 97.10% of the peer group.
Dan Abrams
Speaker details