Speaker summary
97%1 analyzed article/video67 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Culver City officials results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Burden of Proof, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 83.6% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 151 faulty-reasoning hits from 67 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 56.3% and a BS Rank of 74% (7,492 of 28,364 speakers). This Culver City officials is worse (more manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group.
Culver City officials
Speaker details