Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video20 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cox's campaign results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Confirmation Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 20 faulty-reasoning hits from 20 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (1,239 of 37,939 speakers). This Cox's campaign is worse (more manipulative) than 96.70% of the peer group.
Cox's campaign
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠97%Cox's campaign (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 20
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos