Author summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video811 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dana Gentry results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 396 hits. Analysis detected 2,521 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (3,317 of 8,285 authors). This Dana Gentry is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Dana Gentry
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠60%Dana Gentry (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,244
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Dana Gentry attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Dana Gentry vs sitewide
Dana Gentry attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos