Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video63 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Councilor Patricia Nolan results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias and Overconfidence Bias, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 82.5% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 156 faulty-reasoning hits from 63 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 82.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (6,721 of 40,165 speakers). This Councilor Patricia Nolan is worse (more manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group.
Councilor Patricia Nolan
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠84%Councilor Patricia Nolan (selected)83%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 63
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

83% percentile
025507510083.3% percentile
82.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos63 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 82.5%82.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 82.5%82.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 82.5%82.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Burden of Proof: Speaker 82.5%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 82.5%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 82.5%, sitewide 4.6%Burden of ProofSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos