Speaker summary
70%1 analyzed article/video27 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Citi Institute results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 108 faulty-reasoning hits from 27 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 98% (1,043 of 37,883 speakers). This Citi Institute is worse (more manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group.
Citi Institute
Speaker details