Speaker summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video12 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cindy Cobb results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 18 hits. Analysis detected 54 faulty-reasoning hits from 12 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (7,880 of 45,128 speakers). This Cindy Cobb is worse (more manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group.
Cindy Cobb
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠83%Cindy Cobb (selected)75%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 12
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

83% percentile
025507510082.5% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos12 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos