Speaker summary
46%1 analyzed article/video69.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Steele results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 58.6% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 160 faulty-reasoning hits from 69.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.5% and a BS Rank of 55% (17,445 of 38,736 speakers). This Christopher Steele is worse (more manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group.
Christopher Steele
Speaker details