Speaker summary
⁠49%4 analyzed articles/videos384.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cheryl Cotton results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 505.774 faulty-reasoning hits from 384.333 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (39,624 of 45,122 speakers). This Cheryl Cotton is better (less manipulative) than 87.80% of the peer group.
Cheryl Cotton
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠13%Cheryl Cotton (selected)10%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 384.333
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510012.2% percentile
9.7% BS Score4 analyzed videos384.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 17.8%17.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 8.4%8.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 24.6%24.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 4.5%4.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 5.3%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos