Speaker summary
98%1 analyzed article/video56 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Center for Reproductive Rights results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 140 faulty-reasoning hits from 56 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of 77% (6,663 of 28,364 speakers). This Center for Reproductive Rights is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group.
Center for Reproductive Rights
Speaker details