Speaker summary
50%2 analyzed articles/videos120 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catherine Grace Garner results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote and Self-Serving Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 28.5 hits. Analysis detected 64 faulty-reasoning hits from 120 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 17.8% and a BS Rank of 30% (31,628 of 45,122 speakers). This Catherine Grace Garner is better (less manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group.
Catherine Grace Garner
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
30%Catherine Grace Garner (selected)18%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 120
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510029.9% percentile
17.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos120 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 18.3%18.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 11.3%11.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Optimism Bias: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos