Speaker summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video41.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Carey results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 39.9% saturation with 20.768 hits. Analysis detected 40.768 faulty-reasoning hits from 41.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 36.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (19,291 of 44,972 speakers). This Brian Carey is worse (more manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Brian Carey
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠58%Brian Carey (selected)37%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 41.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510057.1% percentile
36.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos41.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 39.9%39.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 32.3%32.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Speaker 39.9%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 32.3%, sitewide 8.1%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos