Carey returns home to U.S. gymnastics championships with ‘no expectations, no pressure’ 21%

By The Associated Press73%

8/6/2026, 5:53:33 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Anecdotal, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 848 faulty-reasoning hits from 679 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 27.7% and a BS Rank of 21% (23,758 of 29,741 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 79.90% of the article peer group.

PHOENIX  Jade Carey doesn’t need to be at the U.S. gymnastics championships. 
At least, not like this. 
That’s part of what makes it all so sweet. 
The 26-year-old knows she could have walked away following her final season at Oregon State in the spring of 2025, with a resume stuffed with Olympic and world championship medals and her place in the history of the storied U.S. women’s program secure. 
She tried, kind of. 
The athlete who had been going nonstop for the better part of 20 years gave her body a bit of a break after her NCAA career ended. 
It lasted a handful of weeks. 
Then one day, she popped into the gym and, in the words of her father and longtime coach Brian, “started playing again.” 
Emphasis on “playing.” 
If there’s anything the two-time Olympic gold medalist has learned, it’s that taking this too seriously can quickly rob you of the joy that brought you to it in the first place. 
Asked if she feels the weight of living up to the standard she’s set for herself as the Phoenix native prepares to salute the judges at the national championships for a seventh time when the women’s competition begins at Mortgage Matchup Center, Carey shrugs. 
“I just feel like right now I have one more opportunity to just have fun with it,” she said. 
“No expectations, no pressure.” 
Maturing means understanding who she was in 2021 is not who she is in 2026. 
There have been times she’ll randomly come across a video of her gold medal-winning floor exercise routine at the Tokyo Olympics five years ago and think “that was pretty hard.” 
Whether she can get back to that level as she makes a bid for a third trip to the Olympics is anyone’s guess, Carey’s included. 
Her body has held up remarkably well through the years, thanks in large part to the pragmatic approach she and Brian Carey have taken toward her training. 
“I don’t know if that’s coming back,” she said. 
“But you never know. 
And I feel like training, getting back into it this year, was really hard. 
But I’ve kind of hit my stride, and it’s getting a little easier and feeling a little more familiar.” 
Sticking with the plan 
Carey finished second in the all-around to 17-year-old Reese Esponda at the U.S. 
Classic a few weeks ago in her first elite competition since leaving the 2024 Paris Games with a pair of Olympic medals. 
She did it with routines that are designed to serve as a foundation as she methodically builds toward the summer of 2028. 
The plan is to add difficulty as she goes along, but only when she’s ready. 
In her mid-20s, Carey is not the same gymnast who took a circuitous path to the Tokyo Olympics that ended with the floor routine of a lifetime and the most precious of medals around her neck. 
The amount of time she spends in the gym on a given day depends on how she’s feeling. 
She and her father have an understanding that as long as she hits her numbers  meaning, how many times she works on an assignment  it doesn’t matter how long she’s there. 
Some days she can knock it out in three hours. 
Some days, it’s more like eight. 
On the days she’s not feeling it at all, they’ll work on a plan that spreads the workload out over a longer period of time, though that remains a rarity. 
“Normally, it’s like she’s so fine-tuned with her skill, she just gets up and knocks it out,” Brian Carey said. 
That’s kind of what she does. 
What’s perhaps the most remarkable thing about Carey’s career is the way she simply keeps going. 
While some of her Olympic teammates have opted to take time off and recover after a triumphant performance  Tokyo Olympic champion Suni Lee announced last month she is preparing for a return after a two-year hiatus  Carey largely has not. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.9%The Associated Press: 2.2%Denver Gazette: 2.3%Confirmation Bias4.9%This article: 6.3%The Associated Press: 1.0%Denver Gazette: 0.8%Anchoring Bias6.3%This article: 5.9%The Associated Press: 2.4%Denver Gazette: 1.6%Availability Heuristic5.9%This article: 5.4%The Associated Press: 0.6%Denver Gazette: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic5.4%This article: 4.4%The Associated Press: 0.5%Denver Gazette: 0.7%Hindsight Bias4.4%This article: 2.2%The Associated Press: 1.4%Denver Gazette: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias2.2%This article: 2.4%The Associated Press: 8.4%Denver Gazette: 4.7%Framing Effect2.4%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.4%Denver Gazette: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.6%The Associated Press: 0.5%Denver Gazette: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.6%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Denver Gazette: 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.5%The Associated Press: 2.3%Denver Gazette: 2.7%Optimism Bias7.5%This article: 5.0%The Associated Press: 1.3%Denver Gazette: 1.5%Pessimism Bias5.0%This article: 2.4%The Associated Press: 8.5%Denver Gazette: 3.8%Negativity Bias2.4%This article: 2.1%The Associated Press: 1.7%Denver Gazette: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias2.1%This article: 6.5%The Associated Press: 0.9%Denver Gazette: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error6.5%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%Denver Gazette: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.6%Denver Gazette: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%The Associated Press: 0.7%Denver Gazette: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias6.2%This article: 6.9%The Associated Press: 1.5%Denver Gazette: 1.7%Halo Effect6.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Denver Gazette: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.4%The Associated Press: 1.5%Denver Gazette: 0.6%Recency Bias9.4%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.3%Denver Gazette: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Denver Gazette: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.7%Denver Gazette: 1.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%Denver Gazette: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 2.8%Denver Gazette: 1.9%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 6.2%The Associated Press: 0.9%Denver Gazette: 1.4%False Dilemma6.2%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%Denver Gazette: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Denver Gazette: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.9%The Associated Press: 2.3%Denver Gazette: 3.8%Hasty Generalization2.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.3%Denver Gazette: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.4%Denver Gazette: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 4.1%Denver Gazette: 2.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%Denver Gazette: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 7.2%The Associated Press: 2.1%Denver Gazette: 1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.2%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Denver Gazette: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.9%The Associated Press: 0.4%Denver Gazette: 0.3%Burden of Proof4.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Denver Gazette: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Denver Gazette: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.1%The Associated Press: 1.0%Denver Gazette: 1.4%Anecdotal9.1%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.2%The Associated Press: 1.3%Denver Gazette: 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.2%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Denver Gazette: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Denver Gazette: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%Denver Gazette: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.8%The Associated Press: 1.5%Denver Gazette: 1.1%Unattributed Quote2.8%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.9%Denver Gazette: 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 11.5%The Associated Press: 2.9%Denver Gazette: 5.7%Biased Writer Voice11.5%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.5%Denver Gazette: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%Denver Gazette: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%Denver Gazette: 1.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.3%Denver Gazette: 0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

679 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers13%attributed speech590writer words
Selected voice

Brian Carey

100%flagged-word coverage
20 attributed words22% of attributed speech73% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice-13.2 ptsWriter: 13.2%Brian Carey: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.