Speaker summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video55.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brent Cummings results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 150 faulty-reasoning hits from 55.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (22,560 of 45,122 speakers). This Brent Cummings is worse (more manipulative) than 50.00% of the peer group.
Brent Cummings
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠50%Brent Cummings (selected)30%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 55.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510050.0% percentile
30.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos55.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 33.0%33.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 33.0%33.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 17.0%17.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 17.0%17.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 33.0%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 33.0%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 8.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos