Publication summary
36% 8 analyzed articles/videos 6,983 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Hechinger Report results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 3,065 hits . Analysis detected 14,206 faulty-reasoning hits from 40,216 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 17% (489 of 584 publications). This The Hechinger Report is better (less manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 40,216
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.3% percentile 0.9% BS Score8 analyzed articles40.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst