Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video69 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Braeden Huth results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 52.2% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 64 faulty-reasoning hits from 69 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (27,226 of 45,128 speakers). This Braeden Huth is better (less manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group.
Braeden Huth
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠40%Braeden Huth (selected)24%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 69
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

40% percentile
025507510039.7% percentile
23.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos69 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 52.2%52.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 8.7%8.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 52.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos