Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video30 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bolien results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 15 hits. Analysis detected 30 faulty-reasoning hits from 30 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (12,142 of 43,896 speakers). This Bolien is worse (more manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Bolien
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠73%Bolien (selected)50%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 30
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510072.3% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos30 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos