Author summary
â 10% 1 analyzed article/video 2,247 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joshua H. Shields results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 3.7% saturation with 336 hits . Analysis detected 2,749 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of â 9% (8,441 of 9,213 authors). This Joshua H. Shields is better (less manipulative) than 91.60% of the peer group. Joshua H. Shields
Author details
Total words: 8,988
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.4% percentile 1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst