Speaker summary
⁠51%3 analyzed articles/videos85.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bola Tinubu results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 39.7% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 96 faulty-reasoning hits from 85.5 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 26.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (24,747 of 45,122 speakers). This Bola Tinubu is better (less manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Bola Tinubu
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠46%Bola Tinubu (selected)27%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 85.5
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510045.2% percentile
26.4% BS Score3 analyzed videos85.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 39.7%39.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 20.7%20.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 19.0%19.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 39.7%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 26.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos