Speaker summary
60%1 analyzed article/video138.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Blake Davenport results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 27.4% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 303 faulty-reasoning hits from 138.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.8% and a BS Rank of 30% (30,604 of 43,608 speakers). This Blake Davenport is better (less manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group.
Blake Davenport
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
30%Blake Davenport (selected)18%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 138.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510029.8% percentile
17.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos138.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 20.2%20.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 23.1%23.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 27.4%27.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 27.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 15.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 6.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos