Speaker summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video112 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Beatriz Zafra results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Indoctrination, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 76.8% saturation with 129 hits. Analysis detected 332.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 112 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (19,703 of 44,421 speakers). This Beatriz Zafra is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Beatriz Zafra
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠56%Beatriz Zafra (selected)35%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 112
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510055.6% percentile
34.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos112 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 76.8%76.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 40.2%40.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 26.8%26.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 26.8%26.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 26.8%26.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 10.7%10.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 76.8%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 40.2%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 26.8%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 26.8%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 26.8%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos