Speaker summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Augusta Gudeman results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 55.6% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 60 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (19,006 of 45,128 speakers). This Augusta Gudeman is worse (more manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Augusta Gudeman
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠58%Augusta Gudeman (selected)38%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 48
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510057.9% percentile
37.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos48 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 55.6%55.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 27.8%27.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 27.8%27.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 55.6%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos