Speaker summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video99 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Audrey Kremer results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, False Dilemma, and Loss Aversion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 228.422 faulty-reasoning hits from 99 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 36.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (19,431 of 45,534 speakers). This Audrey Kremer is worse (more manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group.
Audrey Kremer
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠58%Audrey Kremer (selected)37%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 99
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510057.3% percentile
36.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos99 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 31.7%31.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 19.9%19.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 2.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 19.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 0.4%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos