Speaker summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video13 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Attorney Peter White results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 13 hits. Analysis detected 39 faulty-reasoning hits from 13 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (451 of 37,882 speakers). This Attorney Peter White is worse (more manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group.
Attorney Peter White
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠99%Attorney Peter White (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 13
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Analyzed articles and videos