Speaker summary
64%2 analyzed articles/videos50 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ASEAN results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias and Optimism Bias, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 126 faulty-reasoning hits from 50 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 99% (293 of 25,127 speakers). This ASEAN is worse (more manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group.