Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Angela Benander results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice and Optimism Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 96 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (12,302 of 45,128 speakers). This Angela Benander is worse (more manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group.
Angela Benander
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠73%Angela Benander (selected)50%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 48
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510072.7% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos48 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos