Speaker summary

⁠100%1 analyzed article/video41 analyzed words

BS Summary: These American Civil Liberties Union Voting Rights Project results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 82 faulty-reasoning hits from 41 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (267 of 38,572 speakers). This American Civil Liberties Union Voting Rights Project is worse (more manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group.

American Civil Liberties Union Voting Rights Project

Speaker ranking list

Percentile	Speaker	BS Score
⁠0%	The Brookings Institution	1%
⁠0%	Conor Heffernan	1%
⁠0%	Gen Jack Keane	1%
⁠0%	MARGARET BRENNAN	1%
⁠0%	Shahryar Yadegar	1%
⁠100%	American Civil Liberties Union Voting Rights Project (selected)	100%
⁠100%	314 Action Fund	100%
⁠100%	21 Grams	100%
⁠100%	2035 Initiative	100%
⁠100%	1X representative	100%
⁠100%	1455 Storytelling Arts	100%

Speaker details

Total words: 41

Article count: 1

Authors

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Federal judges allow new Tennessee congressional map⁠^21%

ABC News⁠^41%By DAVID A. LIEB Associated Press⁠^26% HANNAH SCHOENBAUM Associated Press⁠^23%7/23/2026, 4:59:17 PM