Speaker summary
74%1 analyzed article/video297 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amelia Tarpey results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Overconfidence Bias, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 42.1% saturation with 125 hits. Analysis detected 586 faulty-reasoning hits from 297 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.9% and a BS Rank of 31% (31,032 of 44,452 speakers). This Amelia Tarpey is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group.
Amelia Tarpey
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
31%Amelia Tarpey (selected)18%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 297
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510030.2% percentile
17.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos297 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 42.1%42.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 20.5%20.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 24.2%24.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 21.7%21.7%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 9.6%9.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 42.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 26.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 0.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos