Speaker summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video45 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Roberts results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal and Negativity Bias, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 120 faulty-reasoning hits from 45 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (5,005 of 21,947 speakers). This Amanda Roberts is worse (more manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
Amanda Roberts
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠78%Amanda Roberts (selected)67%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 45
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos