Author summary
76%1 analyzed article/video954 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Mangan results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 414 hits. Analysis detected 2,555 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,862 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (1,907 of 5,453 authors). This Dan Mangan is worse (more manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
Dan Mangan
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Dan Mangan attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Dan Mangan vs sitewide
Dan Mangan attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.