Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video129.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Farrand results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Indoctrination, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 60.1% saturation with 87.375 hits. Analysis detected 345.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 129.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (16,096 of 28,364 speakers). This Amanda Farrand is better (less manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
Amanda Farrand
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠44%Amanda Farrand (selected)27%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 129.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos