Speaker summary
100%1 analyzed article/video37 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alvarado-Barnes results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 148 faulty-reasoning hits from 37 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 100% (162 of 25,395 speakers). This Alvarado-Barnes is worse (more manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group.
Alvarado-Barnes
Speaker details