Speaker summary
⁠34%2 analyzed articles/videos219.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Allison Poulos results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Slippery Slope, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 34.369 hits. Analysis detected 80.369 faulty-reasoning hits from 219.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (38,947 of 45,144 speakers). This Allison Poulos is better (less manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group.
Allison Poulos
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠14%Allison Poulos (selected)11%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 219.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

14% percentile
025507510013.7% percentile
10.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos219.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 15.4%15.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 9.3%9.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos