Author summary
19% 1 analyzed article/video 1,019 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chalkbeat Philadelphia results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Pessimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 373 hits . Analysis detected 1,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,076 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 34% (6,276 of 9,471 authors). This Chalkbeat Philadelphia is better (less manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group. Chalkbeat Philadelphia
Author details
Total words: 4,076
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Nature: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst