Keyword summary
31%1 analyzed article/video496 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wild Boars results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 124 hits. Analysis detected 955 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 52% (24,599 of 51,257 keywords). This Wild Boars is worse (more manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group.
Wild Boars
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Wild Boars attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Wild Boars vs sitewide
Wild Boars attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.