Keyword summary
3% 1 analyzed article/video 1,198 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Voting In Texas results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 1.4% saturation with 66 hits . Analysis detected 548 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,792 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.7% and a BS Rank of 1% (53,578 of 54,002 keywords). This Voting In Texas is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group. Voting In Texas
Keyword details
Total words: 4,792
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.8% percentile 0.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst