Author summary
⁠25%1 analyzed article/video948 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalia Contreras results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 256 hits. Analysis detected 1,968 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,844 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (2,353 of 5,470 authors). This Natalia Contreras is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Natalia Contreras
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠57%Natalia Contreras (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,844
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Natalia Contreras attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Natalia Contreras vs sitewide
Natalia Contreras attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos