Keyword summary
98%1 analyzed article/video650 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Jordan Relations results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 135 hits. Analysis detected 1,520 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,950 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 68% (16,613 of 51,302 keywords). This US Jordan Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group.
US Jordan Relations
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
US Jordan Relations attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
US Jordan Relations vs sitewide
US Jordan Relations attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.